Preval HealthPreval Health

Meta-analysis · Lancet 2010

CTT 2010

Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.

The bottom line

More intensive LDL-lowering with statins produces further, dose-dependent reductions in major vascular events and all-cause mortality, with no evidence of harm from very low LDL levels.

BenefitUS status: Not applicable

At a glance

Medicine
More intensive statin therapy (and statin therapy vs control)
Compared with
Less intensive statin regimens (more vs less intensive trials) and control/placebo (statin vs control trials)
People
170,000
Who took part
Individuals in randomised trials of statin therapy (at least 1000 participants, at least 2 years' treatment duration), including those with LDL cholesterol lower than 2 mmol/L on the less intensive or control regimen
Design
Meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials (more vs less intensive statin regimens, and statin vs control)
Follow-up
Median follow-up 5·1 years (more vs less intensive trials) and 4·8 years (statin vs control trials)
Main question
Major vascular events (and major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction)

Main result

More intensive statin regimens produced a 15% (95% CI 11-18; p<0·0001) further reduction in major vascular events compared with less intensive regimens; combining both trial types, major vascular events were reduced by RR 0·78 (95% CI 0·76-0·80; p<0·0001) per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction.

Effect on LDL cholesterol

Weighted mean further reduction in LDL cholesterol at 1 year was 0·51 mmol/L in the more vs less intensive trials; effects expressed per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction

Other results

All-cause mortality reduced by 10% per 1·0 mmol/L LDL reduction (RR 0·90, 95% CI 0·87-0·93; p<0·0001), largely due to reductions in coronary heart disease deaths (RR 0·80, 99% CI 0·74-0·87; p<0·0001) and other cardiac deaths (RR 0·89, 99% CI 0·81-0·98; p=0·002); no significant effect on stroke deaths or other vascular deaths.

Safety

No significant effects were observed on deaths due to cancer or other non-vascular causes (RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·92-1·03; p=0·3) or on cancer incidence (RR 1·00, 95% CI 0·96-1·04; p=0·9), even at low LDL cholesterol concentrations.

In the trial's own words

“Compared with less intensive regimens, more intensive regimens produced a highly significant 15% (95% CI 11-18; p<0·0001) further reduction in major vascular events, consisting of separately significant reductions in coronary death or non-fatal myocardial infarction of 13% (95% CI 7-19; p<0·0001), in coronary revascularisation of 19% (95% CI 15-24; p<0·0001), and in ischaemic stroke of 16% (95% CI 5-26; p=0·005). Per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, these further reductions in risk were similar to the proportional reductions in the trials of statin versus control. When both types of trial were combined, similar proportional reductions in major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction were found in all types of patient studied (rate ratio [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·76-0·80; p<0·0001), including those with LDL cholesterol lower than 2 mmol/L on the less intensive or control regimen. Across all 26 trials, all-cause mortality was reduced by 10% per 1·0 mmol/L LDL reduction (RR 0·90, 95% CI 0·87-0·93; p<0·0001), largely reflecting significant reductions in deaths due to coronary heart disease (RR 0·80, 99% CI 0·74-0·87; p<0·0001) and other cardiac causes (RR 0·89, 99% CI 0·81-0·98; p=0·002), with no significant effect on deaths due to stroke (RR 0·96, 95% CI 0·84-1·09; p=0·5) or other vascular causes (RR 0·98, 99% CI 0·81-1·18; p=0·8).”

Quoted from the abstract of Lancet 2010, checked word for word against PubMed. PubMed 21067804 · Full paper (DOI)

Common questions

What did the CTT 2010 trial find?

More intensive LDL-lowering with statins produces further, dose-dependent reductions in major vascular events and all-cause mortality, with no evidence of harm from very low LDL levels.

Who was in CTT 2010?

170,000 people. Individuals in randomised trials of statin therapy (at least 1000 participants, at least 2 years' treatment duration), including those with LDL cholesterol lower than 2 mmol/L on the less intensive or control regimen.

What was CTT 2010's main result?

More intensive statin regimens produced a 15% (95% CI 11-18; p<0·0001) further reduction in major vascular events compared with less intensive regimens; combining both trial types, major vascular events were reduced by RR 0·78 (95% CI 0·76-0·80; p<0·0001) per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction.

How much did LDL cholesterol change in CTT 2010?

Weighted mean further reduction in LDL cholesterol at 1 year was 0·51 mmol/L in the more vs less intensive trials; effects expressed per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction

Related trials

Get your LDL treated to a goal

Preval Health's protocols follow trials like this one. Licensed clinicians set your goal, prescribe and recheck until you reach it.

Get started

Education only, not medical advice. Results describe the people in this trial and can differ for you. Talk with your clinician before starting or stopping any medicine. Back to all 106 trials.