Preval HealthPreval Health

Cardiovascular outcome trial · JAMA 2005

IDEAL trial

High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial.

The bottom line

High-dose atorvastatin lowered LDL-C more than usual-dose simvastatin and reduced some secondary cardiovascular endpoints and nonfatal MI, but did not significantly reduce the primary composite of major coronary events or all-cause mortality after prior MI.

No significant benefitUS status: US-approved

At a glance

Medicine
High-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n=4439)
Compared with
Usual-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d; n=4449)
People
8,888
Who took part
Patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute myocardial infarction
Design
prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial
Follow-up
median follow-up of 4.8 years
Main question
Occurrence of a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation

Main result

A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07)

Effect on LDL cholesterol

During treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group

Other results

Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .81). Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .02).

Safety

Patients in the atorvastatin group had higher rates of drug discontinuation due to nonserious adverse events; transaminase elevation resulted in 43 (1.0%) vs 5 (0.1%) withdrawals (P<.001). Serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis were rare in both groups.

In the trial's own words

“A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07).”

Quoted from the abstract of JAMA 2005, checked word for word against PubMed. PubMed 16287954 · Full paper (DOI)

How this medicine works, where it stands and what it costs: Statins

Common questions

What did the IDEAL trial find?

High-dose atorvastatin lowered LDL-C more than usual-dose simvastatin and reduced some secondary cardiovascular endpoints and nonfatal MI, but did not significantly reduce the primary composite of major coronary events or all-cause mortality after prior MI.

Who was in IDEAL?

8,888 people. Patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute myocardial infarction.

What was IDEAL's main result?

A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07)

How much did LDL cholesterol change in IDEAL?

During treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group

Related trials

Get your LDL treated to a goal

Preval Health's protocols follow trials like this one. Licensed clinicians set your goal, prescribe and recheck until you reach it.

Get started

Education only, not medical advice. Results describe the people in this trial and can differ for you. Talk with your clinician before starting or stopping any medicine. Back to all 106 trials.