Preval HealthPreval Health

Lipid-efficacy RCT · J Clin Lipidol 2015

ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE trial

Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: The ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial.

The bottom line

In statin-intolerant patients, alirocumab lowered LDL-C far more than ezetimibe and caused fewer muscle-related adverse events than statin rechallenge with atorvastatin.

Primary lipid endpoint metUS status: US-approved

At a glance

Medicine
Alirocumab 75 mg SC every 2 weeks (plus oral placebo), with dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 depending on week 8 LDL-C values
Compared with
Ezetimibe 10 mg/d (plus SC placebo Q2W); atorvastatin 20 mg/d rechallenge arm (plus SC placebo Q2W)
People
361
Who took part
Patients at moderate to high cardiovascular risk with statin intolerance (unable to tolerate ≥2 statins, including one at the lowest approved starting dose) due to muscle symptoms
Design
Randomized, single-blind placebo run-in followed by double-blind, active-comparator, 2:2:1 randomized trial with statin rechallenge arm
Follow-up
24 weeks
Main question
Percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (intent-to-treat), alirocumab vs ezetimibe

Main result

Alirocumab reduced mean (standard error) LDL-C by 45.0% (2.2%) vs 14.6% (2.2%) with ezetimibe (mean difference 30.4% [3.1%], P < .0001)

Effect on LDL cholesterol

Baseline mean (SD) LDL-C 191.3 (69.3) mg/dL (5.0 [1.8] mmol/L); alirocumab -45.0% (2.2%) vs ezetimibe -14.6% (2.2%), mean difference 30.4% (3.1%), P<.0001

Other results

Skeletal muscle-related events were less frequent with alirocumab vs atorvastatin (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99, P = .042)

Safety

Skeletal muscle-related events less frequent with alirocumab vs atorvastatin rechallenge (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.99, P=.042)

In the trial's own words

“Alirocumab reduced mean (standard error) LDL-C by 45.0% (2.2%) vs 14.6% (2.2%) with ezetimibe (mean difference 30.4% [3.1%], P < .0001). Skeletal muscle-related events were less frequent with alirocumab vs atorvastatin (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99, P = .042).”

Quoted from the abstract of J Clin Lipidol 2015, checked word for word against PubMed. PubMed 26687696 · Full paper (DOI)

How this medicine works, where it stands and what it costs: Evolocumab (Repatha) and alirocumab (Praluent)

Common questions

What did the ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE trial find?

In statin-intolerant patients, alirocumab lowered LDL-C far more than ezetimibe and caused fewer muscle-related adverse events than statin rechallenge with atorvastatin.

Who was in ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE?

361 people. Patients at moderate to high cardiovascular risk with statin intolerance (unable to tolerate ≥2 statins, including one at the lowest approved starting dose) due to muscle symptoms.

What was ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE's main result?

Alirocumab reduced mean (standard error) LDL-C by 45.0% (2.2%) vs 14.6% (2.2%) with ezetimibe (mean difference 30.4% [3.1%], P < .0001)

How much did LDL cholesterol change in ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE?

Baseline mean (SD) LDL-C 191.3 (69.3) mg/dL (5.0 [1.8] mmol/L); alirocumab -45.0% (2.2%) vs ezetimibe -14.6% (2.2%), mean difference 30.4% (3.1%), P<.0001

Related trials

Get your LDL treated to a goal

Preval Health's protocols follow trials like this one. Licensed clinicians set your goal, prescribe and recheck until you reach it.

Get started

Education only, not medical advice. Results describe the people in this trial and can differ for you. Talk with your clinician before starting or stopping any medicine. Back to all 106 trials.