Preval HealthPreval Health

Imaging RCT · JAMA 2022

PACMAN-AMI trial

Effect of Alirocumab Added to High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The PACMAN-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.

The bottom line

Adding alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy after acute MI led to significantly greater regression of coronary plaque burden, lipid content, and thickening of fibrous caps over 52 weeks, with similar adverse event rates to placebo.

Plaque regression / favourable changeUS status: US-approved

At a glance

Medicine
Biweekly subcutaneous alirocumab (150 mg; n=148) added to high-intensity statin therapy (rosuvastatin, 20 mg), initiated less than 24 hours after urgent PCI of the culprit lesion, for 52 weeks
Compared with
Placebo (n=152) added to high-intensity statin therapy (rosuvastatin, 20 mg)
People
300
Who took part
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction at 9 academic European hospitals (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [9.7] years; 56 [18.7%] women; mean [SD] LDL-C level, 152.4 [33.8] mg/dL)
Design
double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial
Follow-up
52 weeks
Main question
Change in IVUS-derived percent atheroma volume from baseline to week 52

Main result

Mean change in percent atheroma volume was -2.13% with alirocumab vs -0.92% with placebo (difference, -1.21% [95% CI, -1.78% to -0.65%], P < .001)

Effect on LDL cholesterol

''

Other results

Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was -79.42 with alirocumab vs -37.60 with placebo (difference, -41.24 [95% CI, -70.71 to -11.77]; P = .006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67 μm with alirocumab vs 33.19 μm with placebo (difference, 29.65 μm [95% CI, 11.75-47.55]; P = .001)

Safety

Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs 72.8% of patients receiving placebo

In the trial's own words

“At 52 weeks, mean change in percent atheroma volume was -2.13% with alirocumab vs -0.92% with placebo (difference, -1.21% [95% CI, -1.78% to -0.65%], P < .001).”

Quoted from the abstract of JAMA 2022, checked word for word against PubMed. PubMed 35368058 · Full paper (DOI)

How this medicine works, where it stands and what it costs: Evolocumab (Repatha) and alirocumab (Praluent)

Common questions

What did the PACMAN-AMI trial find?

Adding alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy after acute MI led to significantly greater regression of coronary plaque burden, lipid content, and thickening of fibrous caps over 52 weeks, with similar adverse event rates to placebo.

Who was in PACMAN-AMI?

300 people. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction at 9 academic European hospitals (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [9.7] years; 56 [18.7%] women; mean [SD] LDL-C level, 152.4 [33.8] mg/dL).

What was PACMAN-AMI's main result?

Mean change in percent atheroma volume was -2.13% with alirocumab vs -0.92% with placebo (difference, -1.21% [95% CI, -1.78% to -0.65%], P < .001)

How much did LDL cholesterol change in PACMAN-AMI?

''

Related trials

Get your LDL treated to a goal

Preval Health's protocols follow trials like this one. Licensed clinicians set your goal, prescribe and recheck until you reach it.

Get started

Education only, not medical advice. Results describe the people in this trial and can differ for you. Talk with your clinician before starting or stopping any medicine. Back to all 106 trials.